A stint of 350 articulation each for these 2 subject-matters delay references including at lease one from: Bordens, K. & Abbott, B. (2013). Research Design and Methods: A Line Approach (9th ed.). Franklin Park, IL: McGraw-Hill.
1. Topic: Scientific Explanations
Using phrenology, astrology, graphology, palmistry, numerology, ESP, or another pseudoscience as an specimen, explain how philosophical explanations are higher to twain “common sense” and “belief-based” explanations. How do the regularitys of pattern and the judicious regularity embody to this argument? (Minimum 350 articulation)
2. Topic: Research a Theory
It is less that you earn commence the collaborative line of examineing your learning ideas and opinion a investigation that you appetition to distinct into a learning intimateion. Using the Library or another line, you should experience a system or quantity in psychology that you would enjoy to canvass. You should explain the quantity or system and what it is environing the subject-matter that makes you nonproduction to canvass or perceive it over collectively. Be specific and distinct, supportive and substantive: intimate germinative avenues of learning, examine regularitys that appear expend, or still n ess germinative quantitys or incorporeal issues that may initiate. (Min 350 articulation)
References including one from: Bordens, K. & Abbott, B. (2013). Research Design and Methods: A Line Approach (9th ed.). Franklin Park, IL: McGraw-Hill.