Analyze the movie: After watching the movie, you allure transcribe a 4-6 page criticism, consisting of: a) intro provision noting the concatenation of the movie to the continuity b) one page description/summary of the discontinuance of the film -How was the fiction presented? -------i.e. flashbacks, sequential, from a summit character's summit of purpose, etc. -What was the intent of the film and/or filmmaker? -------Was this intent fulfilled or met? -Did the way the movie was done and presented desire the satisfied? -Were there unfair scenes or occurrences, which pellucid out as substance qualitative to the fruit of the fiction and/or to your agreement of it? -Major corporeal summits of the movie? -Any minor summits made? -Any 'unintentional' results of the movie? c) 0.5-1 page in which you argue how favorite humanization themes were contrived in the movie use at lowest 3 examples d) 1-2 pages in which you use at lowest 4 sociological/pop cultural concepts expert in this continuity to exrefer-to the movie (refer-to dispose materials as you do so) e) Exrefer-to which issues emerged as the the weakest? f) Briefly collate the favorite humanization themes in the movie you watched for this assignment to another movie you enjoy previously seen that had correspondent themes. The paper should be typed, double-spaced, 12-summit font, 1” margins.   Please be enduring to use sources and format citations in the APA citation format (including the movie).