1. Watch this deficient video concerning correspondence and causation:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8B271L3NtAw
2. Read the minority of the APA ethics enactment that involves Inquiry (Standard 8). http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
3. Read the forthcoming inquiry designation and the newspaper designation involving Facebook.(representation and paste the links in your browser if they don't known). They are environing the corresponding examine. The NYTimes designation conquer acceleration you interpret what you are balbutiation on the PNAS office.
4. Briefly condense what the inquiry examine was environing and what the findings/results were (This part of your post should simply be a 2-3 sentences).
5. Using the advice you erudite environing correspondence and causation from your textbook balbutiations and video detail if the fruits explain causation or correspondence? If so, set-forth whether it is correspondence or causation and why. (gladden be circumspect not to disorder relationships delay purpose and movables). What other variables could statement for the fruits? (Explain).
6. Using the advice you erudite from balbutiation the APA Ethics enactment, retort the forthcoming: If this inquiry was conducted by psychologists, were there any ghostly issues/violations as a fruit of conducting the test? Explain and subsistence your tally. You may to-boot understand any other thoughts concerning the inquiry.